We are delighted to announce that our physical office is re-opening to our existing and new clients. To provide safety to both our clients and staff, we are adapting the CDC guidelines for social distancing while we are in the yellow phase. Rest assured, that we have and will continue to regularly clean all areas of the office especially the high-traffic areas. All attorneys and staff will have their temperature taken daily and will be wearing masks when interacting with clients. Any attorneys and staff with a temperature of 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit or higher will work remotely. They will then be required to follow CDCrecommended steps, including not returning to work until the CDC criteria to discontinue home isolation are met.

As the health and safety of our clients and their families is our top priority, we are asking that our clients follow the procedures below during the yellow phase:

  1. Upon entering the building, we ask that all persons wash their hands or hand-sanitize. We will be providing access to soap, hand sanitizer and disinfectant wipes.
  2. We will also be taking temperatures with non-contact thermometers upon entering the office.
  3. Our office is set-up to comply with social distancing of six feet. In the conference and mediation rooms we are asking that each person sit a minimum of one chair apart from attorneys and/or staff at all times.
  4. Masks are available and will be provided open request.
  5. Teleconferences Zoom meetings, and FaceTime are available in lieu of inperson meetings if requested.
  6. We will continue to have the drop-box available for delivery of documents.

In the event that anyone is sick or have been exposed to COVID-19, we ask that you reschedule your appointment or utilize the electronic forums listed above.

As each county determines the procedures that will be followed, please ask your attorney of the specific procedures regarding the county in which your case in pending.

Please note that we will also continue to accommodate the needs of new clients, who are welcome, and as always we encourage and appreciate referrals. During this uncertain and unprecedented time, please stay safe and remember that Sweeney Law Office, LLC will remain by your side for all of your family’s legal needs. We ask that you have patience during this challenging time.

Let Our Family Help Your Family

Pennsylvania hears of child custody case involving adopted child

Pennsylvania residents may be interested in a child custody case that has garnered some international interest. A couple had adopted a child from another country during the time they were married and are having a dispute over the girl’s custody now that they are divorced. Activists from the girl’s birth country demonstrated outside the courthouse where both sides of the child custody case are being presented.

The wife began procedures to adopt a 4-year-old girl several years ago. The husband, who is currently fighting for sole custody of the girl, is claiming his ex-wife was not truthful about the state of their marriage during the adoption process. He says the misleading statements she made about his faithfulness to their vows and her willingness to remain in the marriage until the adoption was completed breached international adoption laws.

Their marriage lasted four years once the adoption was finalized. The father has remarried a woman who has the same ancestry as the girl and wants the girl to study and appreciate her heritage. The husband has accused his ex-wife of hating the girl’s birth culture, so much so that she blasphemes the country where the girl was born. A report on the case said the mother and her attorneys would not give a statement.

Because there is some dissension in most divorces, there is usually a need for guidance when it comes to the welfare of the children. Divorcing Pennsylvania parents have several legal options on how to proceed with dividing financial and physical placement arrangements. Although personal feelings between parties tend to get in the way of such child custody agreements, the best interest of their children should be kept in mind.

Source: pagesix.com, “Custody battle between financier, ex-TV exec“, Ian Mohr View, June 28, 2015


FindLaw Network