At Sweeney Law Offices, LLC, we are committed to maintaining the highest level of client care while balancing the health and safety of our clients. Per the various orders of the Governor of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Supreme Court, until April 30, 2020, Sweeney Law Offices, LLC will remain open remotely, we will be available to communicate with clients via telephone and, if necessary, video calls. We will have regular access to email, fax and U.S. Mail. Although our office location will be generally closed to the public, we have set up a drop box outside of our door, which will be checked daily, so that clients who do not have access to email or facsimile can continue to provide important documents to our office. Please note that we will also continue to accommodate the needs of new clients, who are welcome, and as always we encourage and appreciate referrals. During this uncertain and unprecedented time, please stay safe and remember that Sweeney Law Offices, LLC will remain by your side for all of your family’s legal needs.

Let Our Family Help Your Family
images

Judge orders unusual sentence in child support case

When a child is brought into this world, it is expected that both parents should care for it, whether they are together as a couple or not. Many couples have a hard time making ends meet with two incomes, so it can be even more difficult for just one parent to sufficiently provide the financial support needed throughout the first 18 years of a child’s life. When a non-custodial parent does not step up to make the required child support payments, he or she will usually face some type of consequence. Pennsylvania parents may be surprised to hear the ruling of a judge against a father who is behind on paying his child support.

The father has 13 children and is behind on support in an amount just over $200,000 for 11 of them. Instead of putting him behind bars, the judge has sentenced him to probation for five years. During those five years, the man is to do everything in his power to keep from becoming a father for the 14th time.

The father’s lawyer argued that he has a right to have as many children as he wants and will appeal the decision. A comparable appellate case sent to the state’s Supreme Court reversed that judge’s original decision because there was no specification on lifting the ban. The judge on this current case stated he did include a way to rescind the ban, which would be for the father to pay the total amount of child support that is due.

Several factors are considered when establishing the terms of a child support agreement in Pennsylvania. The income of both parents as well as any special needs the child may have are just two. Many parents may have questions as they try and figure out the best options for their child. A legal professional who has a thorough understanding of the state’s family law regulations will be able to put their minds at ease.

Source: chronicle.northcoastnow.com, “Judge to man: No more kids until you pay support“, Brad Dicken, June 10, 2016

Archives

FindLaw Network